As one of the first states to tax vapor products, Minnesota has the rest
of the states watching to see how far regulation can and will go in this
new industry before it collapses. One of the most significant advantages
that vapors had over the long established tobacco industry was their significantly
cheaper price. But actual and attempted changes in the law have resulted
in a loss of that competitive advantage.
This past year, Minnesota was on the verge of a $.30 per ml tax on vaping
liquids, which those in the vapor industry claimed would result overall
in up to an 800% tax on vapor products. Fortunately, May 2015, ended without
passage of that bill. But those in the vapor industry know the battle
is far from over. And while vapor tax reform may be on the backburner
for now, Minnesota has continued to introduce harsh proposals for bans
on the industry.
In September, Minnesota also proposed a new tobacco ordinance that would
add vaping and e-cigarettes to the ban on smoking in public indoor spaces.
While a ban on smoking can easily be justified with the smell and release
of harmful chemicals into the air, e-cigarettes create no such problems.
Why, then are legislators so aggressively pursuing this cause?
Most recently, on November 4, 2015, a proposal was introduced to ban nearly
every available flavor of vapor products. Under this proposed legislation,
only tobacco, menthol, mint, and wintergreen flavors would be available.
No doubt under the guise of deterring children from nicotine consumption,
this proposed ban further disadvantages an industry that provides a safer
and healthier alternative to tobacco use.
While on one hand, the bans on particular products and uses seems to cut
into the potential taxable base for states, an industry clean up could
streamline the legislative process. Regulating and taxing a few products
is easier than a wide variety of products, some of which could potentially
fall through the cracks and avoid regulation.
If Minnesota is a good gauge of how far legislatures will regulate this
new industry, manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers across the country
should prepare for regulation on the level of tobacco products. Only time
will tell if the more tobacco-friendly states will remain vape-friendly
as well. But with the decline in tobacco use and dramatic rise of vape
use, the vaping industry remains a huge tax source for states, many of
which are desperate to increase revenue.
In addition, if you are located in Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Illinois,
Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, Maryland, Mississippi, North Dakota, Nebraska,
New Hampshire, Ohio, Oregon, Virginia, and Wisconsin, or other states
with similar laws then you might have a refund based on our theory and
proprietary information. Give us a call to get started today!
In his law practice Mr. Donnini's primary practice is multi-state sales
and use tax as well as state corporate income tax controversy. Mr. Donnini
also practices in the areas of federal tax controversy, federal estate
planning, Florida probate, and all other state taxes including communication
service tax, cigarette & tobacco tax, motor fuel tax, and Native American
taxation. Mr. Donnini obtained his LL.M. in Taxation at NYU. Mr. Donnini
is licensed to practice law in Florida. If you have any questions please
do not hesitate to contact him via email JerryDonnini@TobaccoTaxRefund.com
or phone at 954-639-4496.